Ads on mobile platforms are cheaper than ads on desktop platforms.
But the core of Google’s business is still on the desktop.
In this article I offer 3 key take-aways about mobile and desktop advertising trends you want to know about.

I purchased my first mobile in 1997. It was a 2G device from Ericsson and set me back by about 3,500 DKK (about €500). My second mobile phone was much cheaper in 2000 DKK (see photo).

[su_custom_gallery source=”media: 1807″ link=”custom” target=”blank” width=”380″ height=”470″]

The first generation iPhone was released on June 29, 2007. It changed how users took advantage of 3G technology in a big way (see chart).

Downloading music files became feasible, thereby making the smartphone an increasingly more versatile gadget for entertainment. Voice calls were still made, but listening to music files became popular.

See newspaper clip below and full article here: From 1G to 3G – what a change… People were not downloading MP3 music files in the early 1990s.

You could around 2000, but it was expensive, cumbersome and took about 10 minutes (at least when I did it in Copenhagen). When the iPhone 3 arrived July 11, 2008 it was possible to get the file in 10 seconds. These days it should take just 3 seconds – in theory at least :-)

[su_box title=”With an Apple iPhone 3G, users managed to download MP3 files in 10 seconds.” box_color=”#ff9900″ title_color=”#ffffff”]

From 1G to 3G on mobile networks.


So if we are using 4G now, what will the future hold? Nobody really knows what 5G will bring.

[su_box title=”5G is 10 x faster than 4G: Do I need it?” box_color=”#ff9900″ title_color=”#ffffff”]



What we do know, however, is that all this has changed the advertising business.

Most of Google’s traffic comes from mobile

We may not know how 5G will evolve, but we do have a pretty good idea of how people search for information on the web:

[su_custom_gallery source=”media: 1816″ link=”custom” target=”blank” width=”449″ height=”310″]

An interesting tidbit for the above graphic is that tablet searches are growing faster than smartphone searches using Comscore’s data. In the US most Google search traffic comes from people using mobile devices, as pointed out by Google’s Jerry Dischler, VP of Product Management.

In his presentation, he stated that “more Google searches take place on mobile devices than on computers in 10 countries including the US and Canada,” (the slide he showed pictured a US and Japanese flag).

Google puts tablets and PCs in one group.

What could explain the discrepancy between Google and Comscore’s data? Somebody must be wrong. There are four possible explanations:

1. 75% of mobiles in the US are smartphones. 53% are powered by Google Android and 42% by Apple’s iOS.
Android’s default is Google search… (see US Digital Future in Focus March 2015 Q4 2014 data).

2. Mobile search is growing much faster than anticipated. This may be reflected in Google’s numbers for Q1 2015.

3. ComScore’s or Google’s data are incorrect (see point 1).

4. A combination of these explanations.

Google is neither willing to comment on the above discrepancies to me nor the Wall Street Journal, but Mr Dischler did put the 50% number into perspective. He pointed out that roughly 50% search about cars on their mobile… Roughly can mean anything from 45% to 55% :-)

[su_custom_gallery source=”media: 1819″ link=”custom” target=”blank” width=”500″ height=”220″]

By the way, if people use smartphone devices in the middle of a task such as shopping or cooking, how much does this annoy others?

I, for one, prefer to look at a cook book to find out information about how to bake on a Sunday afternoon. Why mess with a mobile phone? If I need a recipe for pancakes, I search on my laptop.

[su_custom_gallery source=”media: 1818″ link=”custom” target=”blank” width=”500″ height=”230″]

More about Google Mobile Ads – Ad Words Performance Summit

Key take-away #1: Google appears to be scrambling to catch up with Airpush, Facebook and others that appear to deliver great results for advertisers.

Why does Google push mobile?

The quick take-away, assuming these data are accurate, is essentially that Google search revenues may have peaked on the desktop. Google thus either has to acquire market share from rivals on the desktop or boost mobile search revenues to maintain growth.

The ads that Google displays alongside its search results are effective and lucrative in the online marketing world, but Google’s average ad prices have been in decline for several years. Google can try to grow video and display advertising, but the company faces much more competition in those categories.

Dischler said patterns are changing as users hop among devices. “It’s more of a swirl, with people browsing on phones, getting on their desktop at work, then their tablet at home, then purchasing through a store visit or on a phone call,” he said.

To tackle this, Google built a new crop of mobile-friendly ads that rely on data, such as images, product specs and prices, from advertisers, rather than keywords.

When users search for something, Google increasingly

shows a panel or carousel

of listings from advertisers at or near the top of mobile search results. Users can swipe across to see more listings and when they click on them, advertisers pay Google for the traffic.

See more hereMobile ad rates are dropping like a rock

[su_custom_gallery source=”media: 1823″ link=”custom” target=”blank” width=”530″ height=”380″]

Of interest is how the Internet giant tries to cope with these changes. For instance, the fact that mobile ads simply don’t command the same rates as traditional search ads.

Key take-away #2: Google is taking away precious mobile screen space to show ads in search results.
Usability for users will be affected by requiring more scrolling to get to the organic search results.

Interesting:  Google and DrKPI: SEO optimization

Will you like it?

Ads that include a mobile ad function consume 48% more of a smartphone’s CPU. Not so wonderful… is it?

Also increasingly popular are short advertising videos. These are between 15 – 20 seconds, instead of 30 to 40 seconds on a desktop. But that increases the amount of network data I require. Apps that serve advertising, including Google search, use a whopping 79% more network or data. How much this slows things down for everyone else is not yet clear.

And if this is not enough, research shows that your battery goes flat faster as well. A recent study of 21 Android apps shows that the use of ads leads to increased energy consumption (on average by 17%), and requires repeated changes to ad related code.

Must read: Gui, Jiaping; McIlroy, Stuart; Nagappan, Meiyappan; Halfond, William, G. J. (May 2015). Truth in advertising: The hidden cost of mobile ads for software developers. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE). Retrieved May 5, 2015 from

View larger image – What are the hidden costs of mobile ads for users and developers?

[su_custom_gallery source=”media: 1864″ link=”custom” target=”blank” width=”530″ height=”334″]

Key take-away #3: Increasing use of mobile ads results in more complaints about the hidden costs to users' devices.
In turn, it can negatively affect an app's ratings. 
Developers must carefully weigh the trade-offs of incorporating ads into their mobile apps.

What do YOU think?

Do you think mobile ads will increase in price and reach desktop levels?
Have you experienced negative effects on your smartphone due to mobile ads?
What is the BEST mobile ad you have come across?
Do you think Google will succeed with its mobile ads against Facebook?

Watch the full 45-minute video, in which Jerry Dischler explains how these developments will affect mobile advertising, below.

[youtube] [/youtube]

Personal conversation during conference breaks beats digital communication hands-down

Update 2014-05-13: Spotify conversion rate, session moderator at Media Convention got it wrong.
Stefan Zilch CEO Spotify GmbH Germany clarifies – Spotify enjoys a 25 percent conversion rate from freemium to paid client status, not 30 percent (see comments – below).
See also comments by Johnny Haeusler – co-organiser – re-publica 2014.

We talk about the great, the good, the bad, and the ugly at two of this year’s Berlin Web Week components, re:publica 14 and concurrent Media Convention Berlin.
Plus, get pictures and videos, as well as six suggestions for improving re:publica 15.
Keywords#mcb14 #rp14analysisanalytics, contagious contentinfluenceKPImetricsreader comment, resonanceROIsocial sharing, media convention, re:publica 14, Berlin Web Week

CLICK IMAGE - media convention AND re:publica 14: Ideas, data and more: Do not forget to assess and evaluate what it means - the SOCIAL MEDIA AUDIT - GATTIKER #mcb14 #rp14Both re:publica 14 (May 6 – 8, 2014) and Media Convention Berlin (May 6 – 7, 2014) had their own hashtags, #rep14 and #mcb14, respectively, and both were held in the same location. On May 8, Media Convention Berlin’s venues were taken over by LinuxTag attendees and exhibitors.

re:publica 14 advertised itself as being the event of the year:

– three days,
– 500 speakers, and
– 250 hours of programming.

I had gotten myself a ticket for both re:publica 14 and Media Convention Berlin, and here are some of my impressions (of course, I was unable to attend all concurrent sessions, so my account is a partial view of both events).

The Great

Somebody told me I needed to attend Teresa Bücker’s talk (30-minute video below), but I really wanted to attend the session, Supergeiler First Kiss – Viralität nur gegen Kohle (Stellar First Kiss – Virality Only Comes From Cash), but the session was overflowing and the doors had to be closed to comply with fire regulations.

So I had to find another session to attend, and chose Teresa’s. Probably a good thing, since it exposed me to something different. As Albert Einstein would have said, “If you attend a session understanding nearly all, get out of there, choose another presentation or panel where you know little to widen your horizon.” That is what Teresa’s talk offered me, new insights.


Her talk ‘early’ (i.e. some of us had sufficiently recovered from our night on the town so we were up and able to attend) on Wednesday illustrated some activism issues, namely how tough, time-consuming and nerve-wracking it can be to be an online activist. This was a personal account of somebody trying to move and shape things in the political arena using social media, and she was engaging as she shared her tribulations, failures and successes.

Because of this I thought I needed to attend the afternoon workshop with Teresa Bücker and Ingrid Brodnig (check out Ingrid’s VERY interesting blog, see also her fascinating book, which she gave me to read). The workshop gave Ingrid an opportunity to present her ideas and experiences with managing comments on user forums, blogs and so forth. This interesting session’s focus was on traditional media outlets (e.g., newspapers) having online forums. It also gave us the chance to ask some questions for which there was not enough time during Teresa’s morning session. Both Teresa and Ingrid gave us a run for our money, and a lively discussion evolved towards the end.

Among other ideas, Meike Rensch-Bergner (what a blog – go get ’em – check it out!), pointed out that sometimes you need a thick skin to deal with comments, and one cannot take them personally. Such acts of self-preservation seem necessary, especially when your blog or forum addresses a racier topic (Stern somehow managed to get Meike to blog for them on a sexier topic…).

Incidentally, a bigger room with decent seating that is more conducive to this type of work would have been nice, but c’est la vie.

Read on about re:publica 15 AND sign up for our blog newsletter to learn more! Read more